LEGAL AI

Build vs. Buy: Law Firms Developing Proprietary AI Tools

How Kirkland and other major law firms are sourcing legal AI, how build, buy and hybrid strategies compare, and what separates a real technology partnership from co-marketing.

17 August 2026 12 min readDreamLegal Research

Share article

Build vs. Buy: Law Firms Developing Proprietary AI Tools

01  /  EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: Proprietary AI in BigLaw is a hybrid model, not a from-scratch build

 “Proprietary AI” at large law firms usually does not describe a foundation model trained from scratch. The dominant architecture across the market is hybrid, combining four elements: licensed foundation-model capability from providers such as OpenAI, Anthropic or Microsoft; specialist legal applications such as Harvey, Legora, Spellbook or DeepJudge; a firm-built layer covering document retrieval, permissions, prompts, workflows and evaluations; and lawyers who own validation, risk and workflow design.

This hybrid approach is also the most defensible one for a firm operating at Kirkland's scale. Training a fully proprietary model is expensive, difficult to keep current against fast-moving foundation-model providers, and unlikely to outperform specialist vendors across every practice-area workflow. The advantage a large firm can sustain over time is its private precedent base, its workflow design, its security controls and its adoption data, not the underlying language model.

Create a free account to read this industry analysis

Industry analysis is free for members. It takes less than a minute to join.

Or sign up with email

Already have an account? Sign in

Was this update helpful?

Stay informed

Make your next legal technology decision with more clarity.

Join DreamLegal for independent research, market perspectives, and practical evaluation guidance for legal teams.

Create Free Account