Clio Manage vs Smokeball

A standardized, audit-grade view of features, pricing, use cases, and operational fit across these two case management platforms.

Parameters

2 solutions selected

Category

Clio Manage

Case ManagementTimekeeping & BillingTrust AccountingLaw Firm Operations

Smokeball

Law Firm OperationsCase ManagementTimekeeping & BillingTrust Accounting

Use Cases

Clio Manage

Law Firm ManagementLitigation & Dispute Resolution

Smokeball

Law Firm ManagementDocument Management

Overview

Clio Manage

Clio Manage is legal practice management software from Clio, with legal AI built in. It brings matters, deadlines, documents, client communication, time, billing, payments, legal accounting and reporting into one system. It is best for small and mid-sized law firms that want to run cases and the business side of the firm in one place, with plans from $49 per user a month and a 7-day free trial.

Smokeball

Smokeball is legal practice management software for law firms. It brings matter management, client intake, automatic time tracking, legal billing, trust accounting and document automation into one platform, alongside an AI matter assistant. It is aimed at solo, small and medium-sized firms that want less administrative work and more time for clients, across a range of practice areas. The vendor describes its focus as people-law.

Tagline

Clio Manage

Run your entire firm from one place

Smokeball

Less admin. More time for the people who need you most.

Founded Year

Clio Manage

2008

Smokeball

—

HQ Locations

Clio Manage

Canada

Smokeball

—

Funding Stage

Clio Manage

Series G

Smokeball

—

LinkedIn

Clio Manage

—

Smokeball

—

Email

Clio Manage

—

Smokeball

—

Founders

Clio Manage

Jack Newton, Raul Grinberg

Smokeball

—

Recent movements

What Clio Manage and Smokeball have been up to

Launches, partnerships, funding and other news about these products from the last 6 months, by DreamLegal Research.

Courts & Government

Popular comparisons in courts & government

01

PacerPro vs UniCourt

Court Monitoring vs UniCourt DART

Public Records SystemsCompare
02

CourtDrive vs PacerPro

AI Docketing Assistant vs Court Monitoring

Court Case ManagementCompare
03

InfoTrack vs One Legal

AI eFiling vs Court Filing

e-FilingCompare

FAQs

Our matrices are built by mapping every platform against 1,150+ standardized operational and security benchmarks, including SOC 2 and ISO 27001, and verified data protection claims. Paid placement never influences capability checkmarks or comparison scores.

No. Sponsored listings are clearly labeled and kept separate from our comparison scores. No vendor can pay to improve its ratings, checkmarks, or ranking position.

Our comparison data is refreshed monthly, so you're always evaluating platforms against their current features, pricing, and security posture.

We use a combination of vendor questionnaires, public documentation, security certifications, and direct testing. Where sources conflict, our team reviews and resolves discrepancies before publishing a score.

Yes. Custom comparisons tailored to your firm's size, practice area, and budget can be requested from your user account.